It is hard to say so.
You are right to question him saying so with little to no evidence to back it up.
But, considering his further clarification below:
It aligns with what have been advocating for and am now been tagged by some of the team as someone that’s can’t be worked it.
It is simple, when you run private company, do bounty etc, you choose winners however you want (anyone that does not like it can move elsewhere)
But when it’s a DAO community like Jupiverse, care must be taken to carry along the community in such process as much as possible to avoid FUDS. (To be clear no matter how much transparency, there will still be fuds but it will reduce drastically to people with actual bad intentions but when common people with good intentions are left in the dark, then fud sells and spreads like a wide fire easily within the community).
I have written a comprehensive suggestion on how such fuds/distrust around Catstanbul contents could be avoided in future and the DAO need to split Grants and bounties into 2 categories.
Stop pitching the Big creators against small creators in the Jupiverse, the big will always win, the small lose and then you create further division and fuel fuds even more in the jupiverse.
Kindly check it out here:
or