Jupiter Airdrop Proposal for JUPUARY (January 2025)

I like the idea of including everyone that participates in the JUP universe. I think DAO and this form are essential. But obviously there are so many ways to be involved with the JUP community and we should factor all forms of long term support. Let’s keep building and support the community by rewarding loyalty!

4 Likes

Yes it is .
It’s a sign of been informed of what is going on jupiverse and be ready to learn about it weekly.
Consistency about it should be worthwhile

4 Likes

I said that , cos people said it should not be added
My deductions is that it may be removed
If it not removed
Then the reward should go to those that earn and not those that purchase on market.

5 Likes

**

Couldn’t agree more with these suggestions, well thought out - hope team reads this!

5 Likes

You ahve thought about this a lot clearly, I like how each component is not necessarily criteria but a multiplier -

This could be a really difficult part to monitor, the amount of information the team would need to synthesize is quite a lot - especially for twitter. I wonder how they would manage it?

Good thread though, i agree with a lot of your suggestions

2 Likes

So you get a point for each thing you do and theres a minimum amount of points needed to qualify? just thinking, seems quite gamable?

3 Likes

Id really like to see the people that use the products have a sizable part of the airdrop. Perps as an example was not the product it is today that it was a year ago. Many people traded futures with it knowing they were testing a product that inevitably still had some issues. These Jupraunauts I believe are incredibly valuable to the ecosystem.

4 Likes

You are right, it’s quite a lot of info for a team to analyse just for airdrops but I am sure they will find a basic none complicated approach to hit the sweet spot.

5 Likes

They can really create an endpoint that will fetch posts, thread about Jupiter and make jup related stuff as key words, the endpoint will eliminate bots and spamming but nothing should be official announce to stop against twitter spamming till after snapshot.i think sanctum do something similar.

6 Likes

I agree with this. People keep talking about the active users and I’m all favour of doing a multiplier on the allocation and give them extra because they were active and tried to get JUP out there, but in the end jupiter is a aggregator of tokens and products. Without users that use the product, there would be no platform for the people to post on social media. The users of the platform are what keep the platform alive… So they should be rewarded the most.
Remember, its up to the JUP team to kick all sybils and reward real users

9 Likes

Yes
There will surely be a base point to qualify for base reward of the airdrop

6 Likes

I also hope they do so too

5 Likes

Too complicated, bro. And there will be many dissatisfied.
I appreciate your work, thank you.

But I would suggest the following criteria:

  1. using the jupiter platform.
  2. participation in voting.

The voting itself can already be used as multipliers, depending on the number of voting. I hope my words did not offend you. Peace :v:

8 Likes

the only proper way to go

2 Likes

First great Proposal I had a great time reading it and agreed with a lot of your points.

  1. Active Participation (Weight 15%)

Platforms:

  • Twitter
  • Discord
  • Reddit
  • Jupiter Research Forum
  • YouTube

Proposal: Rewarding active participation is crucial, as the Jupiverse thrives on engagement. To ensure a fair representation, consider a points system based on frequency and quality of interactions, such as posts, replies, and content creation. (This may be hard to Judge though)

  1. Trading (Weight 50%)

Methods:

  • Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA)
  • Value Averaging (VA)
  • Limit Orders (LO)
  • Perpetuals (Perp)
  • Swaps
  • Ape

Proposal: Instead of weighting specific trading methods, focus on rewarding active addresses based on overall trading volume and engagement. Introduce a tiered system to acknowledge consistent activity for example:

  • Tier 1: Active for 10 different days each month over at least 6 months with a minimum trading volume of 100 USD.
  • Tier 2: Active for 5 different days each month over 6 months.
  • Tier 3: General participation with less than 5 days each month but still active.

This way, users are incentivized regardless of their preferred trading style, fostering diverse trading practices. (For me personally I would never touch VA and I think I should not be punished for that)


  1. JUP DAO (Weight 30%)

Components:

  • Stakers
  • Active Stakers

Proposal: Implement a tiered ranking for stakers based on the amount staked and the duration of staking. Additional multipliers could reward consistent voting participation and community engagement. For example:

  • Tier 1: Staked over a certain threshold for 9 months.
  • Tier 2: Staked over a lower threshold for 6 months.
  • Tier 3: Newer stakers or those with lower amounts.

Voting Multiplier:

  • For each vote cast, users receive a multiplier that enhances their staking rewards. This could be structured as:
    • 1 vote: Standard multiplier
    • 5 votes: 1.5x multiplier
    • 10 votes: 2x multiplier

This structure encourages both long-term staking and active participation in governance, rewarding members who engage in the decision-making process.


  1. Holdings (Multiplier) (Weight 5%)

Assets:

  • JupSOL
  • JLP Token
  • POAP Collectors from Planetary Call

Proposal: Introduce multipliers based on the quantity and duration of holdings. For example:

  • Long-term holders could receive higher multipliers than those who acquire tokens shortly before rewards are calculated.
  • POAP collectors could be recognized with additional bonuses, incentivizing participation in community events.
18 Likes

I love this allocation but team know the best

5 Likes

I agree for the most part with the only exception being the volume part - it’s easy to game it

The rest seems great!

5 Likes

Distributing airdrops based on the volume criteria was and yet is more beneficial according to me for several reasons:

  1. Incentivizes Active Trading: By linking airdrop rewards to trading volume, users are incentivized to trade more on the platform. This boosts the overall trading activity, improving liquidity and reducing spreads, making the exchange more attractive to other users.
  2. Rewards Loyal Users: A volume-based distribution favors those who actively engage with the platform rather than users who might only hold assets passively. This approach rewards those contributing to the exchange’s growth, ensuring that those who help increase its market activity receive a fair share of the airdrop. Please bear in mind the main reason of the exchange is because of the transactions and without these or if this is to be eliminated users may seek other platforms.
  3. Aligns Incentives with Exchange Goals: The goal of an exchange is to increase transaction volumes and attract more traders. Airdropping based on trading volume aligns with this goal, creating a direct incentive for users to participate more actively and making the airdrop program a tool for achieving strategic growth.

In general, airdrop distribution based on trading volume helps to create a more active and liquid marketplace, supports loyal traders, and ensures that the benefits go to those who contribute to the exchange’s success.

1 Like

Fully agree with this. Maybe the holdings is a bit high but like it

2 Likes

These has been a good outline of how criteria should except for the active participation in socials. It should be onchain tasks. Most of the users don’t engage in twitter or discord due to time constraints.

4 Likes