Introducing Dabba: India's biggest DePin

Unrelated to Dabba more as direct reply on the given topic:

Like I mentioned prior it is not so much the route of “a DePIN project can not use a chrome extension”, I never said that even tho some try to attack the argumentation from that angle.

All I say is if a project only has a chrome extension and wants to argue that this is a DePIN without meeting any criteria for an actual DePIN, that by definition and my subjective opinion they are using the buzzword of trending DePIN to mislead.

I am not sure how else I could explain it, I linked that article that compiles my thoughts on it. Long ago I saw a different linkdrop from @BlueZenith it is early in the Ambient topic which has a similar take.

3 Likes

Agreed to agree to disagree :sweat_smile:

We can choose to debate the exact definition of DePIN all day or we can connect people to the internet. We know what we prefer to do :rocket: :rocket:

Looking forward to many more discussions as the network grows and hopefully catching up in Singapore!

4 Likes

Join us on Drip, as we onboard regional artists into web3 to showcase the Dabba story on ground.

Follow us on the DRiP platform and get a chance to win free Dabba Lite hotspots managed for you at location with high demand:

2 Likes

Hey Merlin, I have been in DePIN space for quite some time now (I was the first person to own a helium hotspot outside of the team) and I would like to highlight a couple of points that might be helpful to think over here:

  1. I agree with you that ideally a project is DePIN when anyone can buy the hardware and deploy it anywhere. But, when projects are just starting, they need to first test the hardware in a particular geographic area to make sure everything works good before expanding. As a matter of fact (which not many people know), when Helium started, the hotspot deployment was restricted to USA and for a few months, other than Helium team no one outside got to own a hotspot. That doesn’t mean Helium was not a DePIN right? Slowly they started allowing anyone IN USA to buy the hotspot and deploy it IN USA. I was living in Canada at that time. But because I wanted to be part of the project as it was super interesting to me and there was no way for me to move to US, I teamed up with my friend in US and we both bought hotspots and my friend deployed for me in our friends and relatives houses. But it was a very very tough job as we had to be on phone for hours together just to explain about the hotspot and to clear all their questions before they could agree to install that hotspot in their house. And even after deployment, it was a pain in the a** to maintain them. It was not until the token got released and it picked up in price in the bull market, individuals caught on to it. For a long time, it was only a bunch of people who were buying hotspots in bulk and trying to deploy them as an LLC (so that they do not face any liabilities in future). It was a hell lot of time and effort trying to explain people about DePIN (that term didn’t even exist at that time). So, I think what Dabba is doing is exactly what Helium did when they started off. Not that different. Will you say Helium is not a DePIN then? No right? Actually Dabba is doing so much better because, in Helium’s case people from other countries couldn’t own any hotspots for almost a year I guess. Not everyone is lucky like to me to have a friend or relative in USA who is willing to take all that pain to deploy hotspots for them. Here Dabba is taking the position of a friend and allowing anyone to buy a hotspot. I would say that is fantastic! Not sure why you think that is an issue.
  2. The most important thing to consider when we are thinking of whether something is Decentralized or not is to see whether anyone can participate in that project or not (without consideration to their income level, accredited or not etc.) and whether anyone can reap the rewards by participating in the network. That is the whole ethos of crypto and decentralization in my opinion. Dabba is definitely decentralized because anyone from anywhere in the world can be part of the project and own a piece of it. Try that with any centralized entity (I saw you brought up Twitter in some context. But I don’t get any rewards and I can’t own anything on Twitter. Not even my tweets. So, it makes zero sense to bring Twitter or any other centralized entity in to this discussion.)
    Even though someone else is deploying on my behalf, I am owning the hotspots in Dabba Network and I am reaping the benefits. Tokens are accruing to my wallet and not Dabba Inc or the Deploying entity. The deployment model itself can differ from project to project and allowing any individual to deploy on their own is also on the Dabba roadmap. Just because they are not doing it currently doesn’t mean they will never do it right? Even if they never do it, I will still consider it a DePIN because it is allowing anyone to participate from anywhere in the world and receive their rewards. Helium didn’t even do that for your information in their early days.
  3. I am not sure how far you know about local Indian scenario but it is totally different than western countries and here Dabba is doing a great work by partnering with LCOs and solving the problem of connectivity. Because, as an individual if I try to buy 50 Dabba hotspots and try to deploy in a village or an area where there is no broadband connection in India, then there is a very high chance the LCOs there might not allow that to happen and they might even thrash me for trying to do that. And no police or no court system is as efficient in India that I can expect to get justice within the next 10 years. So, forget about it. The fact that Dabba is able to figure out a way to get through those hurdles speaks volumes of their understanding of the local situation and finding innovative ways to get ahead.

Anyway, that’s too long of a post than I would like it to be. But hopefully you ponder over those points and allow yourself to rethink what a DePIN could be and not stick to one specific definition.
I hope we don’t need DePIN maximalists (just like Bitcoin Maximalists saying only Bitcoin is the real blockchain, PoW is the only real way to secure a network, Bitcoin is the only decentralized network and everything else is bullshit).

7 Likes

Sorry to be crude, but I do not quite asked for help as there is no fundamental misunderstanding. I feel a bit put out of context as I could circle back to all already said and be helpful myself to explain what I already said- or be condescending and argue you should read better what I did or did not imply and what it entails. My “beef” was settled, I do not want to take the discussion down a darker side, even tho I feel I would win these argument points if put to the test.

In short, to your points:

  1. Pretty much part of my prior: “a DePIN is not excluded by having this and that, I never said that and making that implication is a lazy low hanging fruit, all I said if something is a sole major definer then it is excluded” Please do not try to give me a history lesson on HNT. You say no one outside got a hotspot? Funny that I had them then. You say it was first only for US? Yeah right cause of the encoding but they let me purchase more. I did the first 868 MHz ISM band conversions myself. From the first 36 EU hotsposts (only moment the metric was insightable) 12 were mine. Helium was not a DePIN at it’s time, it did not use the phrase so the argument of if they misused it it redundant. I deployed them also in the US before I deployed them in EU. Not because I was forced into the only possibility being managed devices, but because it was the creative solution to be there early. It was a “can” not a “must”. I beg to differ. And that:

It was a hell lot of time and effort trying to explain people about…

Sorry but I have to take the risk of sounding arrogant, but hey maybe it was “a hell of a time and effort” for you. But not for everyone and not for me. I had people lining up for my installations, in the US and EU. For over a year I had always more people that wanted to host than I had time and devices. In germany I even went into a high spot on mountain with a small settlement of like 30 houses, and picked the house by subjective visual assessment where I wanted my lorawan antenna on, rang the bell and had my new host in under 10 minutes.
I am not a salesman and hate cold calling. But honestly
nowadays it is harder to get hosts because of competition and more negative opinions with normies about blockchain. Back then it was a piece of cake.

  1. The big cherrypick, book 3 chapter 44. Look, the De in DePIN does mean decentralized, but in context. All I read here is a creative argumentation to bend logic on my criticism, no refute or helpful insight, sorry. It has nothing to do with the rewards, maybe read more into the core definitions of DePIN :sweat_smile:
    Also funny that you slipped up yourself, you need to not build openings when argumenting:

Just because they are not doing it currently doesn’t mean they will never do it right?

So you are actually admitting that they are not doing it at the time, right? Look you are free to chime in positive and say you consider things a DePIN because many can participate and get rewards. Fair game. Just does not meet the inherent definition. I too can decide that airlines are absolutely environmental friendly because they offer the option to carbon offset your travel. But some would call me a clown for it. For you DePIN means “everyone can participate and get rewards” … so for you there is no difference between DePIN and DeFI? It applies to both and many other things.

Even though someone else is deploying on my behalf, I am owning the hotspots in Dabba Network and I am reaping the benefits. Tokens are accruing to my wallet and not Dabba Inc or the Deploying entity.

Your owning nothing by the way, at least not the hotspot, you maybe own an NFT. Things I own in DePIN are under my absolute control. I can plug and unplug them, and even if a project would go bust and the hardware turns useless, I would still actually own it because of physics. When the wallet with NFT gets compromised (which never happened to me) I would still own it because it exists in my plain of reality, I still got the device. Dunno, I think it is just a good try with effort from you, a give you that, but to me it is still trying to twist a lot.

  1. Nice try my friend but again you missed some info I clearly put out there prior. Better sometimes to pay attention to details. I said I own property in Calcutta and in Shanteniketan Birbhum. So firstly please do not assume I know less than you about things in India, I will spare you the condescending educationary ramble about the times I did imports there and how lovely I find their police if you treat them with respect but hey… to each their own.

The fact that Dabba is able to figure out a way to get through those hurdles speaks volumes of their understanding of the local situation and finding innovative ways to get ahead.

You really want to argue that it “speaks volumes of their understanding” ? Guess what, everyone I speak and work with in India that is a native resident… has a great understanding of the local situation and knows how to handle them. Given that I have a good network of Brahmin professors from Visva-Bharati University, a few Kshatriya friends, and a lot Vaishya traders do to import and export shenanigans, I might be pampered there, but usually work with municipalities, local authorities and even the court system is no rocket science (if of course you have countrymen support).

Anyway, yes it got longer than I wanted too, in fact I did not want to ramble here anymore but you triggered the trapcard. Funny that you say:

hopefully you ponder over those points and allow yourself to rethink what a DePIN could be and not stick to one specific definition.

when I made a point about terminology and how to not mis-interprete or misuse a definition. Maybe you should ponder about what I actually wrote before and not cherry pick and resort to only taking low hanging fruits?

It is easy to not admit that something is not correct but doing that slight of hand to say “rethink and not stick to specifics, rather thing of what it could be”…

I am not here to sell anyone on a vision, so do not try that with me either.

Also you miss the point about maximalists entirely. It is a self deprecating term that I said to call me a DePIN maximalist because I uphold a very definition of the word. Saying you hope we don’t need DePIN maximalist in context of this debate or my arguments is nothing else than saying “I hope we do not need someone that looks at things if they are correct” … I mean hey why not just call it a DePIN but also… a spacestation? a banana? Utopia? a revolution? Who cares am I right? Lets not stick to specific defintions and allow ourselves to rethink it…

Blockquote (I saw you brought up Twitter in some context. But I don’t get any rewards and I can’t own anything on Twitter. Not even my tweets. So, it makes zero sense to bring Twitter or any other centralized entity in to this discussion.)

Look maybe you should read properly “in some context” because if that makes zero sense, than many of the arguments you said make zero sense and also what others wrote in defense. Because that is exactly my point. They also argued how it is still a DePIN although it does not meet the criteria. And I used Twitter and ATMs as an example how you could misuse and apply. Funny how if they do it it is ok, but on other things it is not and makes zero sense. The irony.

4 Likes

We are live on https://drip.haus/

Join the raffle for a free hotspot miner, and drop by our artists channel as we onboard regional artists into web3 from urban and rural regions our network expands to

2 Likes

It’s great what you are doing. But, as an Internet user, my main concerns are the quality and cost of my Internet connection.

How will the Dabba network address the issue of accessibility? Wouldn’t satellite Internet be the most effective solution for accessibility since it doesn’t require any wired infrastructure?

We offer high-speed, low-latency connections and are also the most affordable option in the market. This has naturally helped create good on ground demand which reflects directly to the data consumption patterns seen from our end users here : https://explorer.dabba.network

For the second part of your question, i would suggest to watch this 2 minute excerpt from an earlier podcast:

2 Likes

WOW. You are doing a greater job then! Very interesting topic. I’ll dive deeper about this.

Thanks for the reply, fam!

2 Likes

Read thru the documents and this sounds like a promising idea. I don’t much like the comparison with UBER, AirBnb and Doordash, as these have proven to be exploitative models in the US and around the world. Perhaps decentralization and a proper DAO mechanism can combat these dynamics, perhaps not. Finally Dabba describes its hotspot owners as business owners, but fails to give a detailed comparison of expenses vs potential earnings, especially in the long run. Understood that it depends on the price of the token, but the information given is still way too ambiguous. Another good thing is that the entry cost is rather minimal, but with zero indication of what the earnings would be for HO business owners, the investment seems more like a shot in the dark. Looking forward to following this community and the project. Cheers.

3 Likes

Thank you for your thoughtful analysis of our Dabba project. Let me address your points:

1.Comparison with Aggregators
We understand your concerns about the comparison to the likes of Uber. Our intention was to illustrate the concept of leveraging existing infrastructure and local expertise, not to emulate their business models entirely.

Our model is designed to empower local entreupreuners to compete against Big Telco, Its reflected in our tokenomics reflects where they can set their own management fees for a global community of hotspot owners.
With DAO mechanisms kicking in post mainnet to help resolve pain points, refine , improve and grow collectively over time

2.Hotspot Owners as Business
We give hotspot owners all the resources they need to start a business in the wireless sector without having to start from scratch, this involves

  • Pairing them up with a Backhaul provider to run the infrastructure
  • Marketing to find new customers to expand their network
  • Find LCO options to deploy and maintain the device with customers
  • Handle customer care

All of this at the minimal cost of owning hotspots on the Dabba Network reducing the barrier for new people to help grow the telecom industry.

Lets dive into costs and rewards

  • Entry Costs: As you noted, the initial investment is minimal, which reduces the risk for participants.
  • Operational Costs: This can vary from 18-40 % of your token rewards based on the team you choose to manage your device
  • To simplify token rewards we have introduced Universal Basic Income. In the 1st year 90% of your rewards are UBI while 10% are based on performance. As the network matures and all stakeholders have a better understanding this will gradually shift more towards rewarding performance metrics.
  • Our Explorer will give you an idea of how much data is consumed on average per device. This is directly proportional to token buyback and burn from fiat revenue
  • You can check the daily token emission as well as yearly emission schedule in our calculator to understand how hotspot owners will be rewarded for their participation

I hope this information helps clarify our model and approach.

3 Likes

Layer Zero DePINs emerging across the developing worlds will build a foundation that will empower billions, 1 minute long clip for the alpha

Watch this space, Pilot PPP Project coming soon

3 Likes

ICYMI check out our product keynote presentation from Breakpoint

4 Likes

No device hardware given, no real access. Gatekeeping on purpose.

1 Like

Hey sorry you feel that way and I understand the skepticism compared to other DePIN’s and a model that everyone us used to but yes hardware is not sold directly on purpose,the needs of end users is most important and our managed deployment model is the best way to serve that demand to get started, the objective is to serve real customers with a meaningful service and this is best first step. shipping hardware is part of the roadmap, just not yet.

2 Likes

It is not about what I feel.

It is not about what ‘everyone is used to’.

Not letting people get hands on the hardware is just gatekeeping and by no means any proof of the needs of end users being most important.

How would selling devices to someone that places them, hurt any ‘end users’? Are they so limited that for every device sold people in india miss a hotspot and get no coverage?

Your managed depoyment moder is the best way to serve demand? So including those two here and the one on twitter already 3 people offered to buy one and place it in relevant hot traffic spots IN EXACTLY THE REGION YOU CLAIM …

Everything that you are tested one is ‘part of the roadmap, just not yet’.

It is the theme through everything.

All just coincidence, right?

Hotspots are so hyper complicated that they are too much of a headache for anyone to deal with, so people should thank on their knees to have this managed service. Figuring out demand is so complex, no one could do it but you. 10 reasons to not let anyone get hold of the hardware, are of course just in best intent and by no means a shady strategy play.

Fake it until you make it. Good thing enough are gullible.

Everything that defines a DePIN is either interpreted ‘however the flying f we want to’ (decentralized NFT marketplace because centralized entity, physical existence because no physical aquisition possible, managed deployment because how could users decide where to place such an infratructure) or simply ‘just because we call it that, does not mean we need to provide it. we are aiming towards it on the roadmap’.

Ask someone from the streets in Sangli Maharashtra, you would be surprised.

2 Likes

It’s unfortunate that you feel that way, we’ve been at this for over 7 years and don’t intend on going away, anytime soon.

Catering to demand means that revenue is being generated, immediately at the deployment of every hotspot, that’s just good economics, it shows the project is geared for longevity, providing a service that is being meaningfully utilised. It’s much harder to do this from a traditional, you get the hardware and deploy it model. ( Again we’re not saying that’s a bad model, just that emerging economies need a different approach for mass adoption)

Managed deployment is our business model , I respect it if you don’t agree with that model, but in no way does it make it misleading or dishonest.

I say wait and watch , proof really is in the pudding , we choose to focus on providing connectivity where it’s needed and building a sustainable model. We have the leadership, team, track record and market to make that happen and we’re super excited for what’s to come.

2 Likes

Its not about getting a hotspot and connecting it to your existing connection. New broadband connections are being laid out here, which include laying out the fibre, dealing with local politics, maintaining the infrastructure when the roads keep getting dug up and managing a dedicated backhaul provider

Its funny you have made a dabba theme profile to intentionally fud here, not sure what you achieve by this
join our discord community
ask questions and get educated on the ground reality

1 Like

It is more funny that everyone that jumps here into defense, only created an account to participate in this one topic thread of the entire part of Jupresearch, and comes with flailing arms. Not sure what they achieve by this. Oh yeah right, positive sentiment without critical questions being asked. Naturally those totally not forged users come in here an act like everything is better than otherwise.

Arguments are always flipped, as in that only if someone complains that no one CAN get a physical device, it is acted as if that users says all devices should be only deployed physical and not managed at all. Only to ride home on how the managed approach is logically better. Smoke and mirrors.

If any constructive criticism or pointing out of flaws is labeled as FUD, it shows a lot about how defensive debate is treated. Maybe before taking the high stand of ‘get educated on the ground of reality’ maybe actually come with a counterargument instead of just playing the appeal to authority fallacy card. Do not always assume you are smarter than others, it really just shows weakness and narrow vision.

If you have the power to ‘educate on the ground of reality’ you can not do that here? So weak!

And of course again some solid contradiction here, suddenly it is about new broadband connections, fibre, local politics and the best joke about it all, maintaining the infrastructure.

So on one side just to not give those devices into peoples hands, you want to argue that it is not exciting and hotspots are nothing special, but then again doing maintenance on a wifi hotspots seems to be suddenly a thing only in core team engineers can do, give me a break.

And as for that mumbo jumbo about connectivity, fibre and local politics, it is very funny that 3 people already offered to aquire a device because they are exactly in the deployment region, have existing fibre connections and authority over their property there. But yeah. Local politics. Everything is soooooooo complicated. Totally makes sense.

1 Like

Dabba theme profile?

You have to be kidding me.

Maybe google that term.

1 Like