Jupresearch has the badge system for example, but looking into it one can see that while certain badges have multiple users owning them, those are all pretty redundant ones tehy would get after time- Like make X posts, X likes, a quote, a namecall, etc. Those badges or ranks that need intent to get them, all around 5 users have them and maybe 3 more or trying to get them and that is about it.
I like the idea to interweave it with incentives, but there I am also worried of the outcome. Like if there is anything to be gotten from participation, the quality of contributions in Jupresearch might instantly hit rock bootom.
As I see it, the team has not tapped into 40% of the Discourse options and fully leverage its capacity_
-tags > categories = better SEO
-reaction emojis = faster feedback = more engagement
-wicki contribution openes = deeper content, more engagement + better SEO
But even if they took those low hanging fruits, in the end Discourse is quite limited to real interoperability for ranking systems (still better than Reddit, far far away from Discord).
If we look at Jupiter Discord, it has 6230% higher on average engagement per day 2024, but if I were to eyeball it, it probably has 95% redundant content and a lot low quality contribution. I mean by intent. It is a open chat and everything gets scrolled up into the abyss. But while I mourn a lot how little engagement on Jupresearch can be, naturally we would not want the āto the moonā stuff here either.
A little sad to me that 70% of the projects introducing to LFG spam artificial content. Like almost all their posts from allegged āusersā are always accounts that make their first post in their topic, never come again, have no reading history, no further contribution, userpic or anything.
There are those projects that simply try to grift, but there are others which are legit but try to attain relevancy by using spam accounts and throwaway emails, which is not just sad, but borderline pathetic. Mostly because it is so obvious, while still treated by the team as genuine engagement.
I think the incentives to participate in Jupresearch should be not so much āgive me shiny icons and titlesā but on the other side also not āincrease my airdropā as both do not really help.
I would like an approach, not sure if realistically feasable, where people that drive the conversation forward can attain visibility. Would not hurt to invite some of the super active users, or those with interesting proposals to one of the AMAās and make it a bit more inclusive and less driven by nepotism.
Grants are good do not get me wrong, but I would like to see the open side of a DAO thrive more than just the incentivized. Sometimes feels like the same people farming these, and that is by no means because only they care and try.