Voting YES for Jupuary is a step toward building a strong, united, and decentralized Jupiter community. This initiative aims to accelerate the ecosystem’s growth, engage real users, and foster active participation. By supporting this plan, you contribute to achieving the following goals:
Community and Protocol Growth: Jupuary will create conditions for significant user base expansion, enhancing Jupiter’s impact and value.
Unity and Engagement: The event is designed to unite all community segments under a shared vision and purpose, ensuring a process that is as inclusive and transparent as possible.
Fraud Prevention: The team will strengthen measures to prevent abuse, implement proof of authenticity, and ensure participation from genuine users, making the process fair and effective.
Long-Term Value: The project is structured to end Jupuary with a motivated, active, and engaged community, without requiring strict token lock-ups.
Your Vote Matters: This is your chance to directly influence Jupiter’s future. A YES vote supports an initiative that could transform the entire community.
In Summary:
Jupuary is not just an airdrop but a strategic move to develop an ecosystem focused on active participants and long-term success. By voting YES, you show your belief in this project and its potential to become bigger, stronger, and more valuable for everyone involved.
You will notice that most people who want Jupuary to happen are those who have between 100 and 10k jup locked.
A serious user wouldn’t remotely consider voting Yes! That’s aberrant.
The most committed catdets currently, developed their dedication and passion for jupiter due to the 1st jupuary and the commitment the team showed to the community back then.
People all shouting PPP Experiment until it’s time to vote jupnuary, whale fight over hold bags while others advocating for big allocations to become whale. It’s life experiment, rich Vs the poor, Minority Vs Majority, Cabals Vs The people, Government Vs The Mass. It’s well.
The Julpiary was promised long time ago…This proposals is looking very strange!it’s something not good behind…And the outcome of this strange proposal will not be in favour of community bat to some minority!!
JUP team wants the Jupuary to happen so that is a fact and they will try with various proposal until the community finally unites and votes with 70%+.
Its not a question if it will happen is only a question of when. I am sure that with each failed vote we will get closer with the next one until it happens.
Firstly, the team is fully committed to ensuring that Jupuary becomes a reality. Secondly, following the first proposal and the feedback received, they now have clear data on why it didn’t pass. Finally, the team should focus on tailoring the proposal to address the concerns of those who voted against it, especially if they represent the big bag holders that can’t see this vote go through without them aligning with what makes them comfortable. Think @meow has indicated strongly after the 1st vote that he is going to do just that as he noted that many who have invested big need to be listened to and their opinions considered if it’s what it takes and that he’s not buying into any sort of ‘wokism’ around that. Without this approach, it becomes a game of cat and mouse, which serves no one.
By aligning the proposal with voter expectations, it sets a precedent for how such processes will work in the future, giving everyone a clearer understanding and managing expectations more effectively. Personally, what I find most concerning is the impact this uncertainty is having on the token in the market. Resolving this will bring much-needed clarity and allow people to refocus on other aspects of the project.
As for me, I didn’t benefit last time, and I’m not particularly concerned if I don’t now. My goal is to accumulate as much as possible during the bear market because I believe in the project’s potential. Anything beyond that is simply a bonus.
This is false. He will keep trying until the end of December. The quick turn around time from the end of the first vote to the second vote shows the commitment and urgency to get this done. I was actually floored with the announcement the second vote was happening that quick. Give the team credit for what they’re doing. It’s not easy to be this transparent.
It’s in the same rally call that you’re referencing, slightly before the timestamp… try and try again until the end of december… and if we can’t come to a consensus, there will be no Jupuary.
It’s in the community’s best interest to get this passed, but we need to be comfortable with it. Looking forward to the new proposal. If it doesn’t pass again, they will try again and keep trying until the end of the year.
For yes to pass we need to change the purpose of the DAO to be for benefit of Traders which are millions here! iThe voting power should be shifted to users based on trading volume and plus staking !!Like this the DAO will work on behalf of the community…Otherwise the Jupiary will go for ASR!!Even the ASR its look like a Ponzi scheme.is too Scrolish!!I I think Stakers should have normal APY like evrewaere…And the fact claimed tokens from Jupiary to go Traders and Traders who stake to have a multiplier!!Lime this we will encourage new traders on Hupiter!Dont forgot Traders brings income paying fee.Stakers doesn’t generate nothing
