After going through the proposal, I still have some concerns:
-
The number of requests for the working group is very high, as it’s a trial period. I think we need to see the result first before fully funding this. If we continue to fund this, it will not be sustainable in the future.I would like to learn more about the cost breakdown details in the Reddit working group proposal. Could you please provide more information on how the proposed costs were determined?
How can we evaluate the success of the program? Why can’t we try it first and see how it goes?
As I mentioned in the other post, the Arbitrum working group for Arbitrum Treasury and Sustainability—Working Group asks for 100 ARB per hour, which is around 100 USD per hour, so we could use this as a standard for working groups.
-
Why do you need 4 moderators, and how many hours will they spend each month? Because of the standard rate of the moderator, it’s around 1000–1500 USD per month. Could you please clarify what their duties and responsibilities are? We need KPIs that could identify the success of this group so we can evaluate its success rate and help develop future programs.
For now, I’m still not supporting this Reddit working group, as per the above concerns. And I think we need a format for proposals like this as well, so every proposal has the same detail that the JUPDAO community needs and receives all the data that is necessary.