I think you are misunderstanding the proposal regarding DAO voters, so let me break it down for you.
Person 1 has 100 JUP
Person 2 has 1000 JUP
Person 1 has 1/10 of the voting power compared to person 2. For the sake of making this simple, let’s say they receive 50% as ASR.
They both voted for 10 proposals. After ASR person 1 has 150 JUP and person 2 has 1500 JUP. The voting power relatively speaking stays the same, person 1 still has 1/10 of the voting power compared to person 2. This means that it does not matter how much JUP you have staked, the relative voting power stays the same.
Let’s have another example.
Person 1 voted for 10 proposals and person 2 voted only 5.
After ASR, person 1 has 150 JUP and person 2 has 1250 JUP. So the voting power moves towards those who are voting on more proposals. Again, the amount of JUP staked does not favour bigger voters. ASR favours the more active voters.
Jupuary reward for DAO voters in this proposal has the same model as ASR. It does not favour bigger or smaller voters, it favours voters who have been more active.
When it comes to decentralising the DAO and voting. As jupuary injects 700M JUP to the market and roughly one third of it is expected to flow into DAO staking and voting ( see this post for more details ), the amount of staked JUP increases from 440M to 670M. This means that the current DAO voters have less power than before and thus Jupiter DAO becomes more decentralised.
What do you think, was this helpful?