Would it be different in your opinion if they would have burned the remaining 215M JUP from J#1 and added 200M JUP to continuation of ASR from elsewhere in the token reserves?
1 Like
The allocation in Jupuary round #1 was 100M JUP (determined by the team). This was changed to 70M JUP for round #2 in my proposal, but has to be shared with probably 10X+ the amount of people so will be significantly less per contributor.
There are way more community contributors than just a few hundred. There are 17,302 users on Jupresearch, around 25,000 people attending weekly calls, and 156,182 users on the Discord Community. There are also work groups and people investing serious time into Jupiter as a community contributed without getting a salary.
These are not just social media posters but the people actually building Jupiter as an extension of the team. People might not have a clear picture of this unless theyâre a more active part of the online community and all the initiatives that are going on.
Not 2k but 20,000,000 (20 Million JUP) extra ser.
1 Like
I didnât even know there is such data available. Opens my eyes. I have to remain more low key liking other people posts from now on.
1 Like
Probably 17,000 out of 17,302 farmers because I donât see more than 302 people active here 
Anyways the team will look at actual contributions based on the submission, and not at just being a member of a certain channel.
But 156,182 members at Discord and over 20,000 people attending calls also says something. And we also have to remember that JUP actually has 814,148 holders after Jupuary #1. Itâs quite a big community and the Jupuaries are really helping.
3 Likes
Sorry. My bad. English not my first language. I guess, I donât understand the word âcontributorsâ.
Dude, Iâm everywhere on social media. I follow Jupiter exchange pretty much where I can. Does that make me a contributor. I donât think so.
Real contributors, probably under few hundreds. If you propose 70 mil tokens for less than 1k contributors, for me, thatâs insane.
Off topic: why is everybody so afraid about JUP losing value after the airdrop? Isnât this the best time to get some more?
3 Likes
Thanks! It comes from personal experience: Would you rather have one person come in once and spend $100 on a meal or have a person come in three times a week for a year and spend $10 a day for a whole year? Once signals loyalty, and that is most important over anything else. Remember Black List with James Spader haha!
3 Likes
Fear of getting hacked
I donât think so
Jupiter claiming site is well secured and I donât see anyone complain about getting hacked when they claimed
3 Likes
It says ââno allocationââ and 0 JUP per wallet, so those 11.3 Million (11,361,557) wallets are excluded / wouldnât get an airdrop.
1 Like
In brutal market conditions like those of 2024, JUP has more then weathered the storm, and the reasons IMO are the expansion of the utility and top-notch UI/UX. But one thing I would suggest for Jupiter Aidrop Round 2, why not integrate a banner in the mobile app inciting users to try the app even more often, buy and stake JUP and build volume.
2 Likes
I donât even consider myself a power user having joined a few days ago but it comes to show the activity levels if I am the top reader 
Interesting insights
7 Likes
Good stuff my man! Itâs great to see
5 Likes
It has been quiet in here for sure. It became more active just recently and mainly for the jupuary debates, which is cool. There has been about 150 people who have visited here at least in 10 different days over the past 30 days. But Iâm pretty sure this place is about to explode when more and more people join for the jupuary debates.
Hope many of them stay even after it. 
5 Likes
Yeah 17000 out of 17302 users on the forum are farmers, but sure those 2.3 million wallets with 1000+$ volume in swaps are definitely all legitimate.
2 Likes
Well said! + minimum JUP stack
2 Likes
This is something which has been already replied to over 20+ times. These 2.3 Million wallets are not the final number. This is the number before deduplication. Deduplication still has to be applied by the team, using data and tools the community may not have access to.
Meow has made it clear in speaking and in writing that deduplication will be used.
The team can use timestamps, browser fingerprints, IP addresses, behavioral analysis, transaction patterns, transfers between wallets and many more deduplication methods to exclude farmers.
It was mentioned 20+ times that the proposal is for adjusted volume, to perform further deduplication and anti-Sybil measures through Blockchain Analysis. Using these tool the team can can easily find clusters of 1,000âs of inorganic bot wallets which can be identified as âfarmingâ. It might be more constructive to ask a question about something if it needs to be clarified, rather than falling into repetition, so we donât keep talking in circles.
2 Likes
Fair point regarding the deduplication method, but then we are left with the manual farmers from African and Asian countries, how would that problem be solved? After all there was 1 airdrop before which rewarded swappers + there are youtube guides on how to farm Jupiter
2 Likes
Keep it up! The more active the betterđđż
5 Likes
Thanks for your fair reply. Concerning manual farming this can be found out and filtered out in the same way. By using methods such as below:
Some important points to consider:
- The moment a farmer transfers from wallet A to B he creates an on-chain connection between the wallets. The more connections, the easier it becomes to filter these out. The certainty of these assumptions can be confirmed with additional proof of farming, such as with timestamps, same IPâs and browser fingerprints, same transaction patterns etc.
- Many farmers in poor countries focus on quantity over quality, because they often donât have a lot of funds to work with.
- For example they may have assumed a wallet with low volume would still get âat least somethingâ like the 200 JUP in last round, but this could not the case anymore and they would not get an airdrop.
- A $1,000.00+ minimum volume limit helps filter out over 1.5 Million wallets with $100.00 - $1,000.00 in transaction volume, and over 13 Million total wallets with under $1,000.00 transaction volume.
- The YouTube gurus donât seem to know much about deduplication at all and are likely wasting the time of their audience for round #2 because theyâre using round #1 criteria assumptions.
- It should be avoided to use opaque, arbitrary and random methods which would filter out many legitimate users - this would be unfair and would furthermore create a reputation and FUD issue on (social)media.
- For example when you use a minimum transaction count, you would unfairly exclude the buy and hold users who just bought $11,000 WEN or JUP or JLP and staked / HODL it, and didnât do any further trading.
- When you use a minimum time the user should have been active on Solana, you arbitrarily and unfairly exclude hundreds of thousands of new users who were on time for the snapshot like all others.
- Instead you can include these users by not using uncertain, unfair and arbitrary methods, buy by using actual data-science based deduplication. By the way, AI can also assist a lot better in data analysis using good tools, when comparing this year to last year.
- You can never exclude 100% of farmers, but you can try to get close to 100% within reason. The $1,000+ lower limit helps to filter out the great majority, and further more specific deduplication would do the rest.
2 Likes
Waiting on your update regarding perp allocation
3 Likes
I wrote larger update in a new topic ~ 7 hours ago, took me also ~ 7 hours to write. The perps update is included in there, but the post is still pending approval. The perps allocation is the most significant change of the new update.
2 Likes