im finding difficult to understand what you said,
first you said ‘imo from the start we should only reward stakers’ okay noted, then you stated ‘loook what happened to scroll they only cared about TVL and volume’ anyway this claim is false they considered whales among users maybe you need more information to understand this.
and now ‘Ofcourse jup is not a chain, but users feel abandoned when the project focus more on rewarding those whales’
do you have any bit of idea how many of the top stakers attain voting power ? maybe this could help
Jupiter Airdrop Round 2 (2025): Analysis, Discussion & Proposal for Distribution - #175 by aped
adding another
surprisingly every votes matches their pure intention, bag it.
but hey waiting for your reply.
i just dont want to be a villain here what im pointing is to furthermore not manipulate the governance by bias pov, this gets one sided while tops stays at the top by attaining more voting right for his one own benefit or one biased view.
i can hardly believe anyone here arguing towards them can make up the list, if they really had that amount of staked person would have flaunted for sure or wouldn’t ever cared to join a conversation like this.