When you don’t agree with something, let’s debate about it. But based on reason and not based on personal attacks, as the one I was replying to.
They will propose something and DAO will vote, but Maow also said we should discuss and argue about it. The team will likely use any good arguments and data they see on Jupresearch.
The team has been clear about the purpose. The purpose of Jupuary is:
- Bringing another 2.1 Billion of the 10B JUP token supply into circulation
- Distributing JUP to the millions of Jupiter users in a decentralised fashion
- Incentivising (not rewarding) the community to engage more with Jupiter
- Guerilla marketing method to create huge hype and (social)media attention
- Aligning with Jupiter’s growth mindset and inclusive community strategy
90% - 96% of people only use Jupiter to for regular trading. Any Jupuary proposal leaving out 90%+ of users will simply not be taken serious, as it goes against the goal and ethos of Jupuary and Jupiter. So let’s continue to discuss with the purpose of Jupuary in mind.