Identifying the True Developer Token Holdings to Prevent Rug Pulls

The cryptocurrency space has witnessed numerous rug pulls, particularly on platforms like Pump.fun, due to the lack of transparency in tracking developer (dev) holdings. While many platforms display insider or dev holdings, these figures are often misleading. Developers can create multiple wallets to secretly accumulate tokens, making it appear as though they hold only a fraction of the supply while retaining full control in the background. When the project is rugged, investors are left without clarity on how it happened.

This proposal suggests launching a competition or bounty program to develop a reliable method for accurately identifying the true allocation of dev-held tokens. Implementing such a solution in the upcoming Jup Trenches initiative will set a new industry standard for transparency and security.

Currently, no reliable mechanism exists to track the actual holdings of a developer beyond the officially declared wallets. This allows bad actors to manipulate token distributions and execute rug pulls without any visible warning signs. The lack of transparency poses significant risks to investors and traders, undermining trust in decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms.

To address this issue, we propose the following:

Competition/Bounty Program: Encourage developers, security researchers, and blockchain analysts to create a method for accurately tracking the real allocation of dev-held tokens. The best solution will receive a reward and the opportunity to have their work integrated into relevant platforms.

Research and Development: Explore on-chain heuristics, wallet clustering techniques, and machine learning approaches to detect related wallets controlled by a single entity.

Implementation on Jup Trenches: Once a viable solution is found, integrate it into Jup Trenches, ensuring that investors have access to verified information about developer holdings.

Enhanced Transparency: Investors will have a clear and accurate representation of developer holdings, reducing the chances of rug pulls.
Improved Security: Fraudulent developers will find it harder to execute hidden exits, leading to a more secure trading environment.
Stronger Community Trust: Users will gain confidence in platforms that adopt this solution, fostering a healthier DeFi ecosystem.

The lack of visibility into true developer holdings is one of the key reasons rug pulls continue to plague platforms like Pump.fun. By incentivizing the community to develop an effective tracking method, we can revolutionize transparency in DeFi. The integration of such a solution into Jup Trenches will position it as the gold standard for security and reliability in the space.

10 Likes

There is a team cold storage wallet that is transparent - you can see movements through there

3 Likes

My proposal is regarding meme coins and how the new ā€œtrenchesā€ feature added could get better it has nothing to do with the teamā€™s cold storage wallet donā€™t worry I trust the team haha, my proposal was implying to add a new feature in the new "trenches platform to add a mechanism to identify true dev holding of a meme coin owner.

8 Likes

Phhhh I get you!

Yes for sure: no one wants to be rugged by dev

5 Likes

It would be great if some coder makes a code that can detect rugpulls. Rug-pulls are a real threat to the crypto meme community. It would be even better if $JUP makes that code and can use it on all of their platforms

5 Likes

Alot of rug pulls in the meme coin space and i wish something can be done to cut this to a minimum . We need a safe space.

5 Likes

this is a very interesting proposal love the idea

5 Likes

Sure. Certainly not even the ruggers ever want to be victim of rugpull themselves

2 Likes

Yeah, indeed Jupiter having it would help traders but this is beyond just code. Itā€™s pure human less predictable greedy behaviours which is tough to end just with codes.

2 Likes

Safe space is hard to come by when you have 2 things in place

Humans + MoneyšŸ˜” = less safe space

2 Likes

This makes sense. How do you plan achieve this?

5 Likes

There are already a lot of great rug check tools out there but still the rugger gonna rugšŸ˜­.

I support the bounty/grant/hackathon options to incentives devs to keep making attempts at it. May be someday we will get rid of 50-75+% as 100% might be impossible until humans is out of the equation (maybe AI dominated future)

4 Likes

I agree, i hope Meow read this post and think about implementing this into the system of JUP

5 Likes

First is the incentive where we from JUPā€™s side they host a hackathon or bounty for dev to find the best way to find all accurate dev holdings, there are primary two issue when it comes to memecoins right before pumpfun there was the issue where if liquidity was not locked well it could get drained so we had that and other problems as well but now pumpfun took most of these problems out since liquidity is always locked and mint authority etc is also renounced through their platform the only way left to rug was through dev holding, so in essence the dev buys with other wallets that are not in accordance with him so when the coin reaches a certain MC he sells all of it. If we do track all those dev holdings Iā€™m sure there is a way to identify them.

3 Likes

Ape.Pro is tackling key issues like these by preventing rug pulls and ensuring organic data transparency. They achieve this through doxxed team members, liquidity locking, smart contract audits, and promoting real user engagement. Their approach aims to fosters a secure and trustworthy trading environment.

If youā€™re working on a similar initiative, have you considered collaborating with Ape.Proā€”theyā€™re actively building solutions for a safer crypto space. Check out their presentation from Catstanbul 2025: Ape.Pro at CATSTANBUL 2025.

3 Likes

Just looked at the full video I think I will reach out to him and propose some ideas if he agrees.

3 Likes

These guys are always willing to help & take ideas onboard. So glad you plan to get in touch. It might just be a case of them asking you to do something to address this particular issue you got interest with and prove yourself and also you can always try and link up with the CWG and show them what you are doing as they are always willing to support ideas that add value to the Jupiverse thru grants.

3 Likes

Yes I was thinking about I was looking for someone who shared the same interest and also who can take on more of the developing side as I am not in that deep but still enough knowledge to understand the basic. Also the CWG how would they help me exactly?

2 Likes

This organic score is pretty cool. I think itā€™s around what this topic is about. I think the fine tuning from learning will allow the rugs to be elsewhere and fewer of them.

As of lately Iā€™ve noticed you have to input the CA for certain coins if it doesnā€™t have an organic score or on JUPā€™s strict list. You must have a minimum of $600 USD value in LP and I think there needs to be a percentage of wallets to hold tokens plus active online use for the coin to register without the hazard :biohazard: symbol.

Maybe Iā€™m missing something?

But I think the main cencept that Jupiter Exchange is doing is trying to not allow these rugs and bad actors on their radar or lists.

3 Likes

Check out the article below from @Slorg of CWG. You got all you need there.

3 Likes