Inspired by Saylor, i will say everyone gets $JUP at the price they deserve. That in essence means, those who had a clearer vision of the Jup project got in early, hard & have a huge range of advantages such as profits etc if the project succeeds. Some fall in this category by doing some work/tasks in the early Jup echo system that lead to them receiving huge airdrops, others bought the token, some staking & currently earning ASR etc. If you apply these dynamics to PPP philosophy, success or fairness will mean different things for different Jup holders at different level of entry. This in itself creates a systemic dynamic that sort of evens out things fairly if the project focuses on ideas to benefit each investor at different levels.
To ensure that every investor benefits from a Jup PPP approach, the project must be structured and managed with fairness, transparency, and long-term sustainability in mind. Here are some key principles and strategies:
-
Clear and Fair Tokenomics: Equitable Token distribution, vesting schedules & use cases and utility.
-
Transparent Governance: Decentralised governance & regular updates.
-
Sustainable Growth Strate: Long-term vision & Partnerships & ecosystem development.
-
Community Engagement: Active community involvement & incentives for participation.
-
Security and Compliance: Robust security measures & regulatory compliance.
-
Liquidity and Accessibility: Listing on reputable exchanges & liquidity pools.
-
Anti-Whale Mechanisms: Limits on large holdings
-
Rewards for Holding (Staking/Yield Farming): Staking Rewards.
-
Exit Strategies: Buybacks or burn mechanisms & exit planning for Investors.
-
Risk Management and Contingency Planning: Risk mitigation strategies. Identify and mitigate risks, such as technical failures, market downturns, or regulatory changes. Having contingency plans in place that protects the project and its investors from unexpected events.
By following these principles, I believe a crypto the Jup ecosystem can create an environment where all investors have the opportunity to benefit fairly, reducing risks of inequitable outcomes or losses that disproportionately affect certain groups of investors. I think this is what @meow, Jup team and Jup communities have been trying to implement through CAT, CEF, DAO, GUM, etc.
These lead to PPP and there will always be some reservation on how that optimal PPP level is achieved individually subject to some of the dynamics highlighted above but if a project aims to achieve all or majority of the key principles & strategies highlighted above, majority will come out better & project flourishes.
What’s your take ladies & gentlemen?