Feedback on the process so far

Now that the team has had 2 votes. Reached the threshold of minimum votes, and had the overwhelming consensus.

It will be interesting to me atleast to see how they execute the proposal. I still look kinda :clown_face: ish to my boss, not because meow dropped n bombs lmao. But because I have been saying crypto is a more expedient process than what most Americans do when they vote.

Several weeks in and we are now waiting on criteria. Which is fine, but I just wish I had said nothing about how the process would be. I can see the team very much seems to care about the engagement in the community. I think Kash and Meow represent the product well, have genuine passion. Honestly all of the things I would look for in a ceo, actual company.

Yet by that same measure I would expect that a team who had previously done an airdrop at this scale would have foreseen many of the issues in year 2. Things seem needlessly over complicated. I’m a little surprised that even California managed to wrap up its counting of votes before the JUP dao.

I will never be one of the people in this forum that goes along with the consensus. Not to be contrarian, simply to provide an honest opinion / experience. Especially when it comes to time / money spent on chain. I’m not here to glaze any fucking body. I do not care about that shit.

I am here to shop for a product that I would invest in long term. Like giving btc to your mom. I’d like to think JUP could be a coin like that for me. Time will tell.

3 Likes

I thought the voting went quite fast. When you want to listen to your community you can’t exsactly prepare anything in advance. But am the same sometimes some people have to play devils advocate in the discussion to help us see the bigger picture. This vote was unique as it was difficult not to get biased one way or the other.

1 Like