Whale Strategy
Exclusive Incentives. Creation of a premium staking program for whales with special rewards and exclusive access to high-value initiatives.
Privileged Earnings Increased returns, unique NFTs, and priority rights to participate in new launches or projects in the ecosystem.
Governance Exclusivity. Decision-making power governed by a model that rewards invested capital, but limits their influence to balance the community.
The goal is to attract whales in a way that brings significant capital to the project, without compromising the balance of power. Their focus remains on high-earning opportunities, distinct from the dynamics of medium and small investors.
Forum for Medium and Small Investors.
Autonomy and dedicated capital.
An exclusive forum, where medium and small investors manage the raised capital (without any influence from the whales).
Dedicated Projects: Creation of initiatives that use available funds to generate stable and sustainable revenues. For example:
Collaborative investments in innovative dApps or marketplaces. Internal crowdfunding to develop products or services that have direct returns.
Avoid X and Discord : An environment free of social tools perceived as useless or distracting, focusing only on community growth.
The goal is to ensure that medium and small investors have a dedicated space to build an autonomous financial future, without having to depend on whales or external dynamics.
Separation of Strategies Total independence The whales’ earnings and strategies remain exclusive and do not directly influence the activities of medium and small investors.
Diversified focus : While whales focus on high profits, medium and small investors work on projects aimed at the sustainable growth of the community. Only for medium and small, Enough arguing about nothing, there are many of us, it would be enough to agree to create big opportunities, united we could be the ones to manage them.
Hey, just read through this proposal. I get the intention of trying to balance whale influence and give smaller holders more room but honestly, the way it’s structured feels off.
Splitting whales and small/medium investors into different groups doesn’t really solve the core problem. It just formalizes the same power imbalance, only now with fancy labels like “exclusive” and “autonomous.” Whales still end up with the best opportunities, and smaller holders get a separate room to talk amongst themselves; it’s more like managing the gap, not closing it.
Also, suggesting people avoid X and Discord because they’re “distracting” feels like the wrong approach. Those are the main places where crypto communities actually coordinate and grow.
If the goal is real balance, I think the better direction would be:
Governance tools that reduce whale overreach, not just separate them.
Better ways for small holders to pool capital and build together.
Incentives for contributions, not just wallet size.
That would create actual strength in the community, not gated classes.
In a financial system you can’t set aside whale because you want to make small investors happy, every successful community need whales that understands long-term vision of a company not small group of people who believe they have equal rights with whale who committed and risk huge fund on a digital token. Anyone who committed huge fund deserve huge rewards but the team can only decide if they want to set aside other allocation for long-term holders.
and i wanted to add.. I believe that “long-term holders” represent the pillar of an economic structure. They must be incentivized and protected because without them, capital would dilute, and the risk of disappearing would become a reality. The majority shareholders, with their secured percentages, including the recently assigned salaries by consensus vote, have protected themselves, which gives them economic breathing room while the economic earthquake or tsunami passes and the ground stabilizes.
Between 2030 and 2035, we expect to understand and visualize the new economic system in operation. Those who survive and are wise investors will see a complete transformation in their lives and those of their close circle. It’s important that we learn quickly and avoid meaningless discussions or disputes, as this only results in a few being silenced and others feeling disappointed and leaving the ship.
I have used AI to translate some of my thoughts more eloquently, being direct and frank, but with the intention of being constructive. Have a great weekend, and the best to each member. I wish you all prosperity and success in your endeavors. Bwishes fam Jupiverse
You’re saying that everything is fine as it is, that there is nothing to change, but the reality is that disappointment is growing. Many valid proposals have already been presented, but it seems that they go unnoticed because priority is given to those who like rather than those who have concrete and useful ideas. Do we really want a system that is based only on this? I don’t think so.
It is urgent to change our approach. We need to renew ourselves, create activities that stimulate real involvement, rekindle enthusiasm and encourage a genuine desire to collaborate and build together. It is too important to stop wasting resources on small prizes of little value and use those funds to create concrete and meaningful projects, chosen collectively by the communities.
In addition to the change of direction, it is essential to reorganize the categories to allow for clear and targeted management. We need to make room for innovative programs, engaging games, creative drawings and other activities that can unite people in a path of growth and shared creation. Only with a well-structured direction can we guarantee real and lasting growth, transforming ideas into concrete actions.
A financial system cannot set whales aside, and it is true: every successful community needs significant investors who understand the long-term vision of a project. However, it is equally important that small investors have the opportunity to contribute in a concrete and creative way, using their ideas, skills and projects to improve not only the system, but also their own condition.
Creating something tangible, such as a game or an app collectively chosen by the communities, can turn into a unique opportunity. This approach encourages collaboration between different groups and allows all skills to be valued, from technical to creative, uniting people in a common path. Reorganizing the categories and concentrating resources on projects of this type, instead of distributing them in small prizes, would give a concrete boost to the entire community and create a sense of real belonging.
Balance and collaboration are the key to building a system that truly works for everyone, respecting the contribution of whales and offering opportunities to smaller investors to make a difference. (give a real chance to everyone)
Here we go again: there are those who prefer immobility, clinging to an apparent power that does not bring innovation or growth. It is clear that to evolve, a system must be flexible and inclusive, capable of embracing new ideas and valorizing contributions of all kinds.
True strength lies in creating opportunities for everyone, encouraging collaborations between groups, from the smallest investor to the whale, and focusing on concrete projects chosen collectively. Only in this way can we build something sustainable, that is useful and truly involves the entire community.
If we continue to repeat the same patterns without innovating, there will be no progress. But if we give space to ideas, creativity and active participation, we can make a difference, together.
One of the best program for small holder to meetup with large holder is a Good cats Idea if you’re small holder and you genuinely contribute to the jupiverse, staking your allocation and participate in ASR could boost your higher income yearly. Apart from the price of jup imbalance Jupiter team have been doing awesome in order to keep community together. Those guys have been giving their community incentive genuinely for every supportive community members.
I appreciate your perspective and acknowledge your expertise in the field. However, I firmly believe that continuing to follow the same beaten path inevitably leads to inefficiencies and waste. It is essential to have the courage to innovate, creating something truly unique and capable of generating tangible results for the community, avoiding the traps of superficial or pure facade initiatives. True strength lies in simplicity and impact, not in appearance.
Looking ahead, after 2026, the cryptocurrency world could face a significant collapse. Many new entrants could feel cheated and lose confidence. For this reason, it is crucial to act with determination and vision, building an ecosystem that values ​​​​every contribution. When every member of the community becomes relevant, even a small landowner can aspire to significant gains, thanks to their skill and commitment.
As I have said many times, we must have the courage to challenge conventions. Small investors should not be seen as tradable pawns, but as real opportunities to build something big and lasting.
The fact is cryptocurrency will still be here till the next 200 years to come, it’s a technology but with different concepts approach every year.
I disagreed with the word collapse but when bear later happens community you give to during bullish their is possibility that 50% stay because of their last experience with the project. Every holders is important whether big or small holders, everyone have role to play in a successful project. If small holders request for more big holders also deserve more for equilibrium purpose.
Every holder has an important role and that success depends on balance. However, I believe that the true strength of a project lies in its ability to adapt and innovate. The initiative I am proposing focuses on this: valuing the contribution of everyone, large and small, creating something that not only generates enthusiasm, but also offers tangible and lasting benefits. I think that cryptocurrency technology can go beyond current concepts, evolving to combine balance and concrete impact. (I keep asking myself why so much skepticism about what I say that in the end we all agree)
I totally don’t agreed with what said because you’re trying to prioritise small holder with less risk than higher holder with more risk to their investments but in my conclusion I stated that inrespective of any holder whether small holder or higher holder everyone deserves equal rights.
I think there was a misunderstanding! My intention was never to give exclusive priority to small investors. From the project I have in mind, whales are as indispensable as pizza is to tomatoes: you can’t do one without the other! My goal is to create an ecosystem where every contribution, big or small, has its value and role. I hope I have clarified my position better! Maybe in some speech I have only recommended using small investors to do something, that they are not here just as spectators.
Just to clarify (I’m looking for investors)… I have nothing against whales, you can let them know that I have a project that could make them money even in lean times, . Not only are they a vital part of our ecosystem, but with the right strategy they can thrive no matter the conditions. Maybe call it Operation Pizza and Tomato so they understand how essential they are!
