Catdets Working Group Proposal - Live, Work, and Play in the Jupiverse [Final]

:waving_hand:Hi…so I gave my general feedback on one of the Discord Townhalls but after I read further through the proposal I realized that the grants program section wasn’t fully explored.


Also…during my research I came across an essay that referenced challenges concerning fairness, transparency & accountability of the grants program.

My assessment of the essay and the conversation that emerged raised deeper questions that I would like to be addressed in this proposal.

:white_check_mark: A few helpful guidelines.

→ Please be as specific and precise as possible.

→ Share detailed examples and scenarios including challenges, obstacles, fixes & resolutions.

→ Offer comprehensive insight, analysis, assessments and/or evaluations


→ Core Questions:

  • How does the grants program comply with the Certainty, Alignment & Transparency [ C.A.T. ] framework?

  • In what ways do the grants program adhere to the Cohesion, Activation, Reach and Education [ C.A.R.E ] paradigm?


→ Follow-Up Questions:

  • How does the current grant program ensure fairness in project approval and funding allocation?

  • How are grant budgets determined and in what ways are budgets adjusted based on project need & scope?

  • What steps are being taken to address concerns about favoritism or bias in decision-making?

  • What is the formal process for handling disputes & appeals when a project feels underfunded or overlooked?

  • Who are the people responsible for managing & directing the grants program?

  • How does the grants program allow the wider community to participate in and support the selection process?


→ Next Step Questions:

  • If someone were to create an archetype blueprint for an improved & efficient scalable model for the grants program…what would that look like?

  • If someone were to build a prototype infrastructure for an evolved & effective sustainable growth system for the grants program…what would that look like?


3 Likes