They will be weighted differently.
There are over 9M active wallet on Jupiter exchange- post first JUPUARY
Pre-JUPUARY we have approx 1M
Jupiter should have lot of criteria- this round will it actually be about No cat should be left out
Any cat that doesn’t meet the criteria(5 of 11-assumptions) should be actually left out
3 Likes
I will likely want this one to have less affinity for token allocation
2 Likes
But they won’t
The community will discuss it
2 Likes
I prefer getting JUP into many hands to align with PPP as I think distribution to a lot of cats is important. However I think there should be a massive weighting towards votes and stakers thats for sure.
4 Likes
I think the team will propose “criteria will be X,y,z”
And then from there we decide yes/no.
I think it’s a fair way.
And in fact that’s how I’d personally prefer it to unfold.
5 Likes
@D3vpurity plus, the community consultation phase is RIGHT NOW.
The team read jup research, so if anyone has any ideas, they can create a topic and the team will consider it.
This is an excellent way to get teams attention.
3 Likes
Yeah voting a staking is honestly the highest form of loyalty to $JUP. As well as promoting PPP
5 Likes
@lochie2001 when something is based criteria simply means you know everybody uses Jupiter swap everyday but not everybody uses DCA, VA, perpetual, participating in governance Doas, from this options you can easily get those base users who often uses Jupiter products.
3 Likes
I was here last JUPUARY
Community start with proposal first
Team perfect it
3 Likes
Watch out for after snapshot
And you will see lot of criteria in discord
Provided the team make use of discord as means of discussing JUPUARY criteria
2 Likes
Correct
Yeah
That’s meaning of base criteria
2 Likes
absolutely not.
staked jup in the voting pool should be the sole criteria.
awarding jup, jlp, or jupsol held in wallets or liquidity pools will shift all the rewards to wealthy whales.
5 Likes
It’s just a bonus and not a base criteria
Just a multiplier
3 Likes
That’s a great idea, we don’t want to happen the same thing that happened with Starknet
2 Likes
i doubt they will let us decide whether ‘‘yes or no’’ but rather they’d be open for suggestions in best case
2 Likes
Not necessarily .
If the the requirement is to have “at least 1 Jupsol”
Then it wouldn’t matter if a whale has 1000 jup sol or 1
3 Likes
What happened to them?
3 Likes
Well that’s typically how the votes go.
They may decide on it and propose it in the overall jupuary vote
3 Likes
But in that case having to be eligible for 5 criteria as a minimum (random examplary number) and each being capital intensive (at least 100-150$ being invested in each Jup product without even calculating the fees spent on the platform) that would exclude lots of real users
3 Likes
Staking/holding JUP and fcking around swaps, DCA etc… should be the main thing, i hope things like staking period, if a person ever unstaked, planetary nfts could play an important role with multiplying rewards.
But at the other end team knows what they are doin, im sure they going to reward loyal members
1 Like