This is so comprehensive. Thanks for sharing. It is important that we know that all cats matter. No one is more beneficial. We all contribute differently but do so all the same to the growth of the community.
I support the above proposal and would like to add that JUP is inclusive and that something very important to be added to its communication is: simultaneous translation in informative videos, rallies, jupuarys, presentations… so that those who are not so familiar with English but are good investors can follow everything and give their opinion! Let’s leave egos aside and be empathetic and inclusive!
Again my only complaint against the team is that they did not make their intentions with JUPUARY 2 clear months in advance. I really have not seen a single argument supporting how this was not something they could have done.
Instead waiting until after the proposed snapshot date to say well, we are thinking about switching things up
Is just more of the same that a lot of us have experienced in crypto. Rug vibes. Deflecting by saying we will have a vote, leave it up to the community.
The staking community ?
People need to understand that USERS are what defines a project
I fully agree, and the language used by the team and most certainly condoned in the discord and here feels only representative of a portion of its users. Arguably a portion that does not generate much to any actual revenue for the team.
By far one of the most active DAOS I have ever personally participated in, looking forward to seeing how this is handled by the team and voted on as a whole by everyone. Science is at work here.
Totally agree. With all the respect, this was a huge mistake and, horrible timing.
We should have skipped the first vote and gone straight to vote 3. 70 percent for a vote that was in their own words contentious lmao.
Glazers will glaze man. Hearing YouTube videos with phrases like “priced in” now is a small consolation.
This post really highlights the core values of Jup’s vision—community and inclusivity. At the same time, it’s worth considering how we balance fairness with rewarding those who actively contribute to the ecosystem in meaningful ways.
Wow wow wow! Anything supporting anti KYC, I’m there bro!!!