Should the Jupuary Airdrop Be Just for Stakers?

[miuq]

I’ll just say that DAO has voted for the core working group, several smaller working groups, 30% supply reduction and will also be voting about many many more things regarding the future of Jupiter, such as jupuary.

Voters are in the center of decision making process and a key pillar of Jupiter. Majority has spent their own money to buy JUP, locking it from the circulation shrinking JUP supply and thus positively effecting to price of JUP.

In my humble opinion, we should not punish voters because they have got APY. I’ll quote my comment in other post:

@miuq

Sure thing, the APY was indeed higher than 45%.

But if we take this into consideration, wouldn’t it then be fair to also consider all those who received jupuary #1? Lots of people got 1k-100k JUP and even more got 200-1k? How about the pool of traders (5-10%) who are profitable and are using Jupiter swap? Or the working groups and others who have been compensated for their community contributions? How about JLP holders?

If we let the APY by staking and voting become a factor on jupuary allocation, wouldn’t it also be fair to introduce deductions for the groups mentioned above?

Let’s focus on inclusivity rather than exclusion.