Glad we can discuss it. Please have a look at the link where we propose a solution to this. Is the Dao really decentralised / voting power!
Maybe you were not here when we talked about thé Jupuary over the last months, but it was very clear that there where two camps. Stakers and exchange users. It also became obvious to everyone because of the nature of what was being discussed (airdrop that is by in itself subject to self interest) it was extremely difficult to get to a point, whereby finally over 70% could agree.
It showed all of us that in some situations a group of people could change the vote in their favour.
Exsample it was better realistically that Jupiter exchange got more users onboarded via airdrop than giving it to stakers. Yet the proposals in the beginning favoured large stakers. Even though they were covered by other rewards already. Most large stakers voted against the first proposal. They finally only voted yes because they were included in the drop. Also it would be very easy for someone or several people who are competitors say of Jupiter with very large capital to control voting of the Dao in it’s current state. So you can see that it might warrant changing.
With someone with Btc in their name you definitely should understand this better than most.