To begin with, the proposal is well written and kudos to you for the work put into it. I was preparing to respond when I came across the argument you made in its defense. Since it aligns with my overall thoughts while reviewing the proposal, I felt it would be best to present my counterargument by addressing this point directly.
Reducing JUPUARY to two consecutive years undermines its potential long-term impact. Spanning JUPUARY over a longer period, three years in this case, not only sustains engagement with existing users but also establishes a consistent and prolonged incentive for new users to onboard. The initiatives like ASR and WG grants might aid onboarding, but they target different audiences and purposes, while JUPUARY provides a unique, recurring opportunity to build a loyal user base. Limiting it to two years risks losing out on its cumulative effects in user retention and network growth.