Yeah, getting jup to the hand of devoted daos is more important to given it to whale who really thinks he’s ahead of order because of volume. Jupiter offers seamless products that you can’t even get elsewhere.
6 Likes
I really like the idea of giving a larger portion of the airdrop firstly to voters equally based on numbers of votes and including this with overall engagement using all the new tools and how much volume a person has accumulated. I have received an airdrop already for staking as in order to vote I was asked to only hold 10 Jup tokens. The airdrop was rather small and would not give me the possibility to increase my voting power. I think locking airdropped tokens for this type of allocation is also reasonable. I think rewarding large stakeholders further would not be very decentralised and would hurt them in the long term. Mainly because bad social media attention affecting price reputation of the project. The other allocations could be separated and based on user interaction and length using the dex since the last airdrop. I believe new users should be heavily rewarded. Then old users and thirdly some random drops to people who have never used the product.
3 Likes
Agreed, getting more tokens into the hands of smaller meaningful votes makes sense
2 Likes
Glad someone understands this:)
1 Like