Proposal: Jup.Eco & The Web Working Group (WWG)

[englandzz]

I’ve decided not to support this proposal in its current state, as I still have some concerns:

• The cost of the budget request is very high. I would like to learn more about how you determined this number in detail, as I mentioned previously regarding the rates for the working group.

@englandzz

, the Arbitrum working group for Arbitrum Treasury and Sustainability—Working Group asks for 100 ARB per hour, which is around 100 USD per hour, so we could use this as a standard for working groups.

• How many hours are you willing to commit to this, both full-time and part-time?
• How can we evaluate the success of this working group? What will be the KPIs for this?
• I also agree with @chasemax regarding the transparency about back pay. The requested amount seems very high.

@ChaseMax

I’m asking for transparency about the back pay. This is a normal website, from what I can see. This isn’t web3 development at all, so the comparison you’re making is disingenuous.

So far, the only thing I’ve seen regarding prior work is a simple web2 HTML website that isn’t impressive in any way. I hope they can prove their value and be transparent, but with the back pay, there is no justification for it.

There’s no way that website is a $15k job

I’m still open to feedback and additional details. I hope you can provide more information on my concerns and help me understand more! Thanks, guys.