Are these documents about your founder and current CEO/head of research or whatever his titles are these days?
I encourage anyone wanting to DYOR reference these docs and decide if this is the type of project JUP holders would actually want to put the reputation of JUP and the LFG behind?
thank you Henry for clarifying that the founder of Composable Finance, who put this team together, is the same as the references I linked. best of luck. take care
LOVE seeing you in here!! Let’s F GO!!
I first heard about your project listening to Santi on the Empire podcast and from CryptoCito’s videos. I am a huge fan of the major ecosystems and love that you’re built in the Cosmos IBC helping bridge the Eth and Sol communities. Really appreciate all your doing and I’d love to see your team in the Jup LFG. Hope to be voting for you in an upcoming LFG round!
Thanks for letting the community know about the scams that took place by these people. They lied to investors and made fake charts to fool people into losing money. I think this is exactly what the community needs so we can choose honorable leaders. Not these scammers who put energy into deceiving people instead of legitimate projects.
Everyone can see from your account that the only engagement and posts you’ve had on this is to call Picasso / Composable Scammy.
We still don’t know if you are a real person or a bot.
I’m putting my professional reputation on the line to tell the world that we are launching ETH / SOL IBC and Solana Restaking.
If you want to put your professional reputation on the line to call me or my team a scam, please reveal yourself.
Otherwise, I don’t know if you come from a competitor, or you are a bot or you are simply a disgruntled community member that lost trust in Composable - which we hope to earn your trust back through our efforts of fulfilling our promise by launching what we said we are going to launch.
In regards to LBP,
LBP stands for Liquidity Bootstrapping Pool. We are launching a LBP on both Ethereum and Solana to prepare for PICA bridging over to ERC20 and SPL. It’s commonly used for tokens that haven’t been launched yet, but the purpose of LBP has always been bootstrapping liquidity for the token.
The LBP is not done to raise funds. As you can see, only 17M PICA is available in the above LBP - this equates to about $135,000 USDC. Any fund raised through the LBP will be used in a DEX pool to support PICA liquidity for when users go across different ecosystems. This is our way of engaging the community members in different ecosystems prior to our IBC connections to those ecosystems, and use the proceeds to further support assets in different DeFi across IBC.
If you don’t understand, or you don’t agree, OK. Feel free to not participate.
yes. i’m a bot. beep bop boo. nice try. I don’t need your swarmy lawyers threatening me.
I speak on you because i know your project extremely well. I doubt you care for your rep or you wouldn’t have joined that team. I saw what you have done to your supporters and what you haven’t done in the Polkadot/Kusama community as a project. It’s shameful. No matter how you want to spin it.
I put my reputation on the line supporting this project long after the most respected people in the polkadot eco said you were a scam. Mind you these are people extremely well connected inside.
So I will warn the Solana eco to not trust you. I am more active in the Jupiter discord discussing other projects. thanks.
PS: great job forcing Fren out of your project. The one guy who was taking bullet after bullet from the community is gone. Ya’ll are a joke. Can’t wait to watch your restaking eat itself.
I find the topic only know and see it has been a bit unattended maybe for “reasons”. Just devils advocating here, my name is out and I do mean no harm.
Look my issue is that as an outsider I see two things here:
on the one side @henrylove who seems on surface level a super reputable persona on Linkedin, who I can see not issue with whatsoever and would personally handle as a prime contact on Linkedin. Someone who does not deserve being mocked or flung dirt at like this.
on the other side, the claims and proof brought up by @MikeAF seem valid towards someone else in the team, and with no word has any of that been combated, so basically it was aknowledged? Time does not matter if a person was allegedly involved in proven fraud, or is part of a new team with prior wrongdoings.
Conclusion:
I have no stake in this, now insight and no idea really, but would prefer that there are clear statements as in “this and that has not happened” or “this or that person is not part of that team” etc.
And then draw a line and move forward without bad blood, just food for thought.