Totally agree. There is nobody on this forum who doesn’t have a personal interest or potential gain from this, some more than others. We have to still be fair and inclusive and consider different users to benefit the entire Jupiverse.
I started my post with an extensive data analysis and based the proposal on that. Then made a ton of changed and additions based on community feedback.
A lot of community members have provided interesting data and arguments in the replies about other aspects like JUP staking and perpetual volume etc. This opened my eyes about including these more and amending the proposal.
There’s probably no need for a duplicate topic unless there’s any new data analysis or insight which is unique or too long for a regular reply in an existing topic.
Looking forward to hear from the team! J4J PPP