If taking your baseline as the idea i would spread Jupuary in maybe 3 main pillars:
Apart from that i would set a vesting schedule for tokens to be vested over period 3-6 months for those that would want the full amount or give them 25-50% if they would want to claim those instantly.
50% for earnstness like Sanctum is waay to big and the key to disaster as weâve seen happen on Sanctum
Thats for the community to decide, but under 10%-15% for sure
I like this theory, id even may JUP ecosystem as high a 80% tbh
Yeah they 50/50 sanctum split was pretty. brutal. Earnestness is a great measure but maybe not 50%?
Had my estimates at about 5%, youâre a bit more generous. I think stakers do deserve a huge chunk along with dex usage. Would do Stakers:Dex usage:JUP DAO:Stakeholders 40/40/10/10. Dilution is a big problem to stakers.
More efficient play is 60% Dex, 20% Stakers, 10% JUP DAO, 10% Stakeholders. In this case itâs better sell all JUP staked to farm JUPâs DEX and JUP DAO to grow JUP bag rather than grow JUP. The guys growing JUP - the working groups, are already getting a good amount of staked JUP so no need to worry about supporting talent with the airdrop.
Does staking and voting on JUP, grow JUP?
I think that rewards should be dispersed based on the current staking period only. This is how dividends are paid out for any company. If there is weighting applied for stakes that go back to previous staking periods this will disincentivize first time stakers.
Yea this is tough as a JUP staker I would love more JUP of course, but getting JUP into the hands of new (and hopefully new JUP stakers) is important to meet the goal of onboarding. While voters should be considered not sure it should be the main part. I think those using other JUP products should be considered as well. I do think that the distributuion should model CLOUD. I feel like they did a good job of the vesting and distribution etc.
Isnât the whole point of an airdrop to onboard new people?
I would love to earn more $JUP because of my staking amount but that can not be the principle criteria.
As other people said, ASR is here to give more voting power to active stakers, which is great.
Also it could be usefull to make thise new users stay.
Maybe like other projects, having a 2 times claim? In the first claim, you can have 50% of your $JUP, based on your activities and usage of Jup products. If you stake those JUP and participate in voting activities during 1 or 2 months, you can double your earning. That way, we can make discover the JUP DAO to those new users.
I agree, because 4 people received more tokens than 50% of the entire community. This is not a good idea because the minority will be satisfied and the majority disappointed. And a good community needs a majority and not a minority of insider individuals.
Whatever the solution is, I think Jupuary has to reward both capital and community contributions. I think Sanctumâs airdrop was skewed too far in favour of âearnestnessâ (community is important, but if you donât adequately reward capital, your protocol may never truly thrive in a competitive Defi landscape) but I liked the idea.
Yes! well said, balance is key for sure
Yes, it 's totally reasonable, a good tweet 
This is right on point.
I think many people staked $JUP assuming a nice airdrop BUT this is not the reason to stake & we already get A.S.R. rewards.
I think rewarding bonuses for 109% voting power used, 75%, 50% or somethingâŚ
I always assumed it was a DEX user reward function and meant mainly to drive hype and new user attention to the amazing JUP ecosystem being built in public rn.
Meow has already stated that ââŚairdrops are a giftâŚâ FWIW.
Onboarding new users and giving current active DEX users a nice gift is what Jupuary is built for. Imo
They took my idea of ââvesting JUPUARY drops. Nice 