Jupiter JUP Airdrop: Balanced Proposal for Jupuary 2025

[JUPWhale]

@coin

These are the two criteria I am thinking right now.

1. What if we just include all trading volume under one category? That means Swaps, LOs, DCAs, and Perps volume are all under one unified category we might call Trading Volume. We can put a lower weight (or higher) for Perps because a portion of Perps fees goes to JLP holder anyway and only a portion goes to Jupiter. We can also put weights for Swaps, LOs and DCAs if that make sense.

This proposal already includes all trading volume and only splits it into 2 categories. The total trading volume is ~ $481.5B.

@JUPWhale

¹ This category includes all trading volume from Swaps, DCA’s and Limit orders. Regular swap trades still represent ~ 71.5% ($344B) of all $481.5B volume on Jupiter, with Jupiter perps making up the remaining 27% of volume ($130B) and DCA & Limit only 1.5% (7.5B). The tier users have to still be added by the team; it represents a small portion of 1.5% with no big impact.

The main trading volume category in my proposal includes $344B swap volume, ~ $6B DCA volume and $1.5B Limit volume. The perps volume is on it’s own with $130B volume (since it’s a very different type of volume with leverage and different fees).

When you read the proposal again, and read every detail, it will become more clear.

@coin

2. Secondly, what if we include $100+ volume in the allocation?

The $100+ category was actually included in my initial proposal and analysis:

@JUPWhale

• All $100+ users²: 40M JUP / 3,885,443 users = 10 JUP per user

But the $100+ tier was removed because some people argued against it, and we used the 40M JUP for Jupiter Perps instead.