Swap volume = 344 Billion (47 times more than DCA & Limit combined)
-
Swap volume = 344 Billion ($344,025,879,459)
-
DCA volume = 5.7 Billion (60X times less than swap / 1.6% of swap volume)
-
Limit volume = 1.7 Billion (191X times less than swap / 0.5% of swap volume)
-
DCA & Limit combined = 7.4 Billion (47X less than swap / 2.1% of swap volume)
Nobody who honestly looks at above data would conclude that Limit Order & DCA (7.4 Billion / 2.1% of swap / 47X less) should get anything near the allocation of Swap volume (344B volume).
If the team would do it according to your proposal, swap & limit order users would unfairly get 47 times more allocation as regular traders / swap users!
The only fair approach here is to treat all volume (swap / DCA / limit) equal, and give a volume multiplier for special / new features (for example 1.5X or 2X multiplier.
Limit order volume 1.8 Billion
- Limit volume = 1.7 Billion (191X times less than swap / 0.5% of swap volume)
.
DCA volume 5.7 Billion
- DCA volume = 5.7 Billion (60X times less than swap / 1.6% of swap volume)
.
Swap volume 344.0 Billion
Swap volume = 344 Billion (47 times more than DCA & Limit combined)
- Swap volume = 344 Billion ($344,025,879,459)
In summary: Limit & DCA which have 47X less volume / only 2.1% compared to swap volume (7.4B volume compared to 344B).
These features clearly don’t deserve a 47X bigger allocation than swap volume. 96% of Jupiter users does not use the swap or DCA, and there is no clear additional benefit for Jupiter for them to do so.
The only fair approach here is to treat all volume (swap / DCA / limit) equal, and give a volume multiplier for special / new features (for example 1.5X or 2X multiplier.