At the ‘power user’ level there is a lot of overlap between users doing DCA/Limit/Perps as well as staking JUP and swapping high volumes. Most people who stake also trade, most people who do DCA also use Limit etc. That’s why I think the numbers of these categories are so similar, 180K, 220K, 300K etc.
You could take all these wallets and deduplicate them in Google Sheets and you’ll see that most of these categories contain the same wallets, so you can’t just add it up. I think you won’t reach more than ~ 300,000 total users if you leave out the < $50 stakers. The 1M - 1.5M you said isn’t based on data but is an assumption.
These categories only include 2% - 4% of Jupiter users or 13% at the most if you consider 2,302,243 instead of 15,650,277 to be the total user count ($1,000+ volume only).
Most people using Jupiter are regular traders or ‘‘swappers’’ like you call them. Per the data 98% of users (300,000 / 15,650,277 x 100) don’t use any other function than regular trading. Even if you only consider the $1,000.00+ trading volume users it’s still 87% (300,000 / 2,302,243 x 100).
Your proposal leaves out between 87% and 96% - 98% of all Jupiter users.
The tiers I made are not based on my ideas but on the actual user data. Why would you only include users between $10K and $100K volume and not others?
I understand some people might want to leave out the $100+ tier with 3,885,443 wallets, although I think it’s great to give just 10 JUP to 3.9 Million wallets.
But there is no good reason to leave out the 2,302,243 users in the $10M+ tier, the $1M - $10M tier, the $100K - $1M tier as well as the $1K - $10K tier.